Jay Bookman

Opinion columnist and blogger with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, specializing in foreign relations, environmental and technology-related issues

Opinion: Trump demands Mexico's complete humiliation, or else ....


In a tweet this morning, President Trump told the world that "if Mexico is unwilling to pay for the badly needed wall, then it would be better to cancel the upcoming meeting" in Washington with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto.

Unwilling to pay for Trump's stupid wall, Peña Nieto then canceled the meeting, which had been expected to deal with the future of trade between the two nations. Mexican officials were already in Washington to hold preparatory meetings, which have also been canceled.

Speaking later to congressional Republicans in Philadelphia, Trump tried to spin the cancellation as a mutual decision and then laid out a hard line.

“We have agreed to cancel our planned meeting,” Trump said. “Unless Mexico is going to treat the U.S. fairly, with respect, such a meeting would be fruitless, and I want to go a different route. We have no choice.”

Let's put this into context: Trump wants to build a wall all along the 2,000-mile Mexican-American border, even though illegal border crossings last year had fallen to one-tenth of what they had been a decade earlier.  The thing has become more of a monument to his ego than a necessity, and even a lot of Republicans understand it as Trump's Folly. “Building a wall is the most expensive and least effective way to secure the border,” says U.S. Rep. Will Hurd, a Texas Republican from a border district.

But as Mexico has pointed out, the Americans of course have every right to do whatever crazy thing they want, as long as it's on their side of the border and they pay the bills.

That's not good enough for Trump. To satisfy his need to be seen as a strongman, he wants to make Mexico publicly grovel. He needs to make the Mexican government humiliate itself before the world and before its own people, throwing away any vestige of national pride, by agreeing to pay tens of billions of dollars for the American wall that it doesn't want.

There's also the matter of practicality. Mexico's economy is 13 times smaller than that of the United States; its government budget is already under immense pressure in large part because of the collapse of international oil prices, with social programs, pension and education spending being slashed. Demanding that it cough up tens of billions of additional dollars to pay for a vanity project for a crazy American president is asking a bit much.

But hey, this is Trump at his bullying worse, picking on a much smaller, weaker opponent to make himself look bigger. It's also stupid. According to White House spokesman Sean Spicer, if Mexico won't pay for the wall directly, Trump proposes to do so by levying a 20 percent tariff on all goods imported from Mexico.

That punitive tariff would have to be approved by Congress, which is highly unlikely. And if it were imposed, the tariff would be paid by American consumers, not by Mexicans. And yes, it would indeed harm the Mexican economy, potentially putting millions of people out of work and making them desperate for a better life somewhere else

Gee, I wonder what would happen then?

 


Reader Comments ...

About the Author

Jay Bookman writes about government and politics, with an occasional foray into other aspects of life as time, space and opportunity allow.