Opinion: ‘ ... summer soldiers and sunshine patriots’


Christopher Wray is a Republican attorney and former federal prosecutor from Georgia. Under President George W. Bush, he served as head of the criminal division in the U.S. Department of Justice, and over the years he has contributed more than $50,000 to Republican political candidates.

Last year, Wray resigned as a partner at King & Spalding to take on a new job as director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, replacing the fired James Comey. President Trump, who named Wray to that job, lauded him at the time as “an impeccably qualified individual, and I know that he will again serve his country as a fierce guardian of the law and model of integrity.”

Today, that “fierce guardian of the law and model of integrity” is engaged in a public battle against the very president who appointed him, and in some ways against the party that had claimed his loyalty. The focus of that battle is a highly controversial “memo” drafted in secret by a cabal of House Republicans, supposedly based on highly classified material, that attempts to undermine and discredit the investigation into Russian meddling and into any role that Trump’s campaign might have played.

Wray is not alone. Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd -- an Alabama Republican, a former congressional staffer for hard-core conservatives Jeff Sessions and Martha Robey and also a Trump political appointee -- has written to House Republicans that release of the memo would be “extraordinarily reckless.” In addition, Wray has personally gone to the White House to plead against its release, warning it could result in the release of highly damaging classified material.

After Trump and White House Chief of Staff John Kelly both indicated that they intend to release it anyway, Wray refused to fall silent.

Instead, at Wray’s direction, the FBI released a rare public statement,  again opposing public release of the memo and expressing what it called “grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.” It is, in short, a lie. 

Neither Wray nor Boyd played any role in the actions covered in the House memo, all of which took place well before they took their current jobs. They aren’t out to protect themselves, and they certainly aren’t trying to cover up a liberal conspiracy against a president of their own party and the man who appointed them, as House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes has charged.

When they warn that the memo is highly misleading and that its release would endanger national security, they do so because that is their informed, professional opinion.  When they dare to publicly defy a president with a hair-trigger temper and a fierce demand for loyalty, when they make themselves targets for the conspiratorial right and its media hounds and endanger their own standing within the Republican Party, they do so because in their minds the risk to themselves is less important than the risk it poses to the country.

Unfortunately, that kind of courage and patriotism is pretty rare these days. Yes, a number of Republicans have tried to distance themselves from the memo and from the larger effort to protect Trump by depicting the FBI, the Department of Justice and Special Counsel Robert Mueller as corrupt, treasonous bureaucrats. They know it’s trouble. They know this is wrong. What they will not do is speak out in strong terms against that effort. Instead of trying to protect their country and their party from such hysteria, they prefer to shrink into self-protective silence and hope the fever passes.

“These are the times that try men's souls,” as Thomas Paine once wrote. “The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.”

So ... thank you, Director Wray.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Jay Bookman

How Exact Match 2.0 happened -- but the real question is why
How Exact Match 2.0 happened -- but the real question is why

This 2018 election could become one of the most litigated in state history. Already, in June, we saw Georgia’s practice of purging from its rolls hundreds of thousands of voters, some dead and many others simply disinterested, given shelter by the U.S. Supreme Court. Monday brought a lawsuit that asked a federal judge to ponder why Gwinnett...
10/18 Mike Luckovich: The butt stops here.
10/18 Mike Luckovich: The butt stops here.

Dem challengers show off massive fundraising tallies in Ga’s top House races
Dem challengers show off massive fundraising tallies in Ga’s top House races

Two years ago, U.S. Rep. Rob Woodall cruised to reelection in his Gwinnett and Forsyth-based House district, easily defeating a Democrat who challenged him on a shoestring budget.  The financial picture couldn’t be more different in 2018. Carolyn Bourdeaux, his current Democratic opponent, has clobbered him in the fundraising department...
The Jolt: New lawsuit challenges Gwinnett rejection of absentee ballots
The Jolt: New lawsuit challenges Gwinnett rejection of absentee ballots

The 2018 race for governor in Georgia could soon become one of the most litigated in state history. The AJC reported Monday that a large number of absentee ballots rejected by Gwinnett County election officials: And you know that one federal lawsuit had already been filed last week, challenging the state’s “exact match”...
Opinion: The true voting fraud
Opinion: The true voting fraud

Fifty-three-thousand Georgia voters have been placed on “pending” status because data on their voter-registration forms do not match exactly with data in other government databases. However, Secretary of State Brian Kemp -- now the GOP nominee for governor -- is correct when he reassures those 53,000 Georgians that they can vote a...
More Stories